The education in chile i think is good but not in all the universities incluiding privates universities and public ones.  In Chile exists stereotypes that if you don’t graduate in a university of “Consejo de Rectores” you must be a bad professional. I think that is absolutely wrong. The quality of the professional every students make it, but in this moment not all the universities give the tools to be a good professional. That I think have to change, all the universities have to give the same quality of education. That it’s the first thing that I will change.

Actually people judge the others about the university that they studied.  A lot of private university just makes bussiness with the education and this education has a poor quality. In some universities the payment are too high so some people who have the capacity to study there can´t get there because they dont have the enough money to pay the payment. I think that education should be free but is a process that take a lot of time.

Other thing that I think have to change is the way you access to universities, the PSU test. This test don’t  measure the capacities of someone just measure memory. All of people that love some careers cant study that for get a low score in the test. Even they have a lot of capacities to the career. And this problem comes to primary school because the difference between public and private school are too high. This level of education has the same problems that the universities. Public school has a poor education quality while the private school has the best educational quality. And the big difference between public and private school is the payment. So first change in the Chilean education will have the quality of education, and after the education must be free for all.

A Saudi woman who dared to drive

The video talks about who people find the freedom. A woman from Saudi Arabia told her story about who she found freedom. First she told a question that her son said to her “we are a bad people?” because two kids from him school attacked the kid because he was different. So the woman think, who is the hardest fight, with the government o the society?

She said that in her country women can’t drive a car but didn’t exist a law that prohibit the women drives. The society oppressed the women community to don’t drive a car. This woman (who told the story) said that she called all the women of the country to be brave and fight for her rights. And she achieved, a lot of women join to this cause and drove a car. Nobody was arrested like the cops did in other moments. She told who she become a kind of hero in the world but in the country she become a traitor. After this, in the country a new “law” afforded the women to drive a car. Finally, the woman said who is the hardest fight for freedom, the fight with oppressive government or with oppressive society? The same question that she began the speech.

I think that all people is freedom. Male or female have the same rights. I didn’t believe that in one country women didn’t drive cars. I think the hardest fight is with An oppressive society because the kids, the new generation learn all this bad things like the story the woman on the video told about her son. The society, in this moment, with the technology we have, is very hard with people that “break the law”. This technology (twitter, facebook) is a very hard weapon too. So the society can judge all the people using a common mind that came to the past and this mind is not the best to this time.

Movie Review

 

Name of Movie: EARTH 2100

 

 

Describe/list/ outline the main themes of the movie.  (50 words)

The movie is about global warming and might happen if people keep the way are living now. The movie show a possible future who would have a lot of virus plagues, drought, wars, death, radical changes of temperature, live without electric energy, gas and oil. And show how the earth would be after all those things. Finally the movie shows how we can live if we take care about the way were living.

 

Write a review (200 words) of the video.  Highlight the importance of the movie’s information/ themes/ topics to your own personal experience and professional perspective.

The video talk about the problems who would have the earth if we don’t care our planet. The video show us a ficticious story about a girl who was born in 2009 when the world still was in good conditions. In the next years (in the video) people didn’t take mind of the mistakes was making for the way was living. People began to cut all the trees, was using more oil (cars, machines) and the earth had a lot of pollution. How people still lived that way the air wasn’t being cleaning, the climate of the earth was in a constant changing so the plants couldn’t live, people began to get sick appeared plagues, virus, shortage of food  people died and the cities was being abandoned. People after all these problems took mind and tried to live sustainably but were to late. From my experience I think that problems colud be true if we live like today. A lot of people haven’t conscience about the damage that we do to the earth. I always see people throwing garbage to streets or people who prefer to use the car than walk o ride a bike. Personally I try to care the cities cause in a future will be an architect and I love the cities cause I work whit the city.

 

List a minimum of three facts, pieces of important information or “other” from the video that you would like to remember and would want to tell a friend about.

 

 

1. The video show the Easter island and how would be if we don’t take care.

 

 

2. People began to take mind of the damage they did to earth and try to do a green life. Planting his own food, using natural energies.

 

 

 

3. Finally, the video show the possible world would have if do the correct things, if we care about our energies, our landscapes, our people. The video try to you get conscience about the way you live.